Free calculator

Idea score

5 questions. 0-100 score. One brutal verdict on whether to build.

Five questions about evidence, twenty points each, one score out of a hundred. Market, buyer, pain, differentiation and willingness to pay. The scoring is deliberately unkind: a yes requires evidence from outside your own head, which is why most first attempts land between forty and sixty and why that is useful rather than discouraging.

Score = sum of 5 answers, where yes = 20, maybe = 10, not yet = 0

About this calculator

Five yes/no/maybe questions across Market, Buyer, Pain, Differentiation, and Willingness to Pay. Returns a 0-100 score plus a one-line verdict so you know whether to commit a weekend to it or move on. A 60-second triage when you have multiple ideas and need to pick one, not a substitute for the full validation work once you've picked.

Your idea, 5 honest questions

1. Market

Are you certain there are at least 10,000 buyers in your reachable market?

2. Buyer

Can you name a specific person (job title + daily situation) who feels this pain?

3. Pain

Have 3+ buyers told you they already spend money or hours trying to solve this?

4. Differentiation

Is there 1+ thing about your approach that incumbents can't or won't copy in 6 months?

5. Willingness-to-pay

Have 3+ buyers joined a waitlist or pre-paid, beyond just saying "interesting"?

Your idea score

Score (0-100)

0 of 5 answered

Answer all 5 questions to see your idea score.

What the number means

Idea score out of 100 Reading What to do about it
0 to 39Act nowYou are working from assumptions rather than evidence, which is a normal place to start and a dangerous place to build from. Spend two weeks talking to buyers. Nothing you code this fortnight will survive those conversations anyway.
40 to 69FragileThere is a real signal here and it is not yet supported. Two weeks of customer development will either lift this above seventy or kill it cleanly, and both outcomes are worth having.
70 to 100HealthyEnough evidence to justify building the smallest useful version. A green light rather than a guarantee: the score measures what you have learned, not what will happen.

Worked examples

SituationNumbers inAnswer outVerdict
Idea from the shower this morning1 maybe, 4 not yets10 / 100Pre-validation. Everything is still a hypothesis wearing a plan's clothing.
Some research, no conversations1 yes, 2 maybes, 2 not yets40 / 100Promising and unsupported. The missing evidence is always willingness to pay.
Ten buyer interviews done2 yeses, 3 maybes70 / 100Just over the line. Build the smallest version and keep interviewing.
Waitlist with deposits taken5 yeses100 / 100Strong across all five. The risk has moved from the idea to the execution.
How this is calculated

Each of the 5 questions scores 20 (Yes), 10 (Maybe), or 0 (Not yet). The total is the Idea Score, 0-100.

The 5 dimensions are the ones that show up in every post-mortem of failed pre-PMF startups:

  • Market. Is there a real buyer pool?
  • Buyer. Can you name a specific persona?
  • Pain. Are buyers already paying to solve this?
  • Differentiation. Can incumbents copy you?
  • Willingness-to-pay. Has anyone committed to pay?

Source mapping: CB Insights "Top Reasons Startups Fail" survey of 110 failed-startup founders. 42% died from no market need (Market + Pain), 17% from being out-competed (Differentiation), 14% from no demand (Buyer + WTP). The 5 dimensions cover the failure modes; the score predicts which dimensions you've validated.

What this doesn't tell you

  • Whether you can actually build it. A 100-score idea with no team to execute is still zero. The score validates the idea, not the team.
  • Whether the timing is right. Some ideas score 80 today and 30 in 2 years (market shift); others score 30 today and 80 in 2 years. Score + timing both matter.
  • The strength of evidence behind each Yes. "Yes" with a paid waitlist of 50 buyers is different from "Yes" with 3 verbal "interesting"s. The calc treats them the same. Use the per-dimension playbook to know which.

How do you know if a startup idea is good?

You cannot know, but you can measure how much of your belief rests on evidence rather than enthusiasm. That is what the five dimensions test: whether the market is real, whether you can name the buyer, whether the pain already costs them money, whether you have any advantage that lasts six months, and whether anyone has paid or queued. An idea nobody has tested is not a bad idea, it is an untested one, and the two are easy to confuse when the idea is yours.

What makes an idea score low?

Almost always the fifth dimension: willingness to pay. Founders can usually name a market, describe a buyer and argue for a difference, because those can be reasoned about at a desk. Evidence that someone will actually part with money requires leaving the desk. This is also why low scores cluster at exactly the moment people feel most confident, which is the fortnight before they start building.

Is a score of 60 good enough to start building?

It is good enough to start testing, which is not the same thing. Sixty means most dimensions are half-supported, and the cheapest next step is a fake-door test: a page, a real price, and a payment button that goes nowhere. If forty of your named buyers see it and nobody clicks, you have saved two months for the cost of an afternoon. If they do click, you now have the evidence that turns two of those maybes into yeses.

Put this on your own site

Free to embed, no permission needed, no tracking script smuggled in. The only condition is the credit link that comes with it, which seems a fair trade for the arithmetic.

<iframe src="https://shipfit.ai/calculators/embed/idea-score" width="100%" height="900" style="border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:16px;" title="Idea score by ShipFit" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Use this with

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between this and an MVP test?
An MVP test costs you 2-6 weeks of build time. This costs you 60 seconds. The Idea Score is the pre-MVP gate. If you can't honestly score yes/maybe on at least 3 of the 5 dimensions today, your MVP will fail and you'll have learned the same thing 2 months later. The score doesn't replace validation; it tells you whether you're ready to start validating.
Why these 5 dimensions specifically?
Because they are the 5 dimensions that show up in every post-mortem of a failed pre-PMF startup. CB Insights surveyed founders of 110 failed startups: 42% died from no market need (Market + Pain dimensions), 17% from getting outcompeted (Differentiation), 14% from no buyer demand (Buyer + WTP). All five dimensions are covered by these five questions.
What's the difference between Yes, Maybe, and Not yet?
Yes = you have concrete evidence (named buyers, paid waitlist, observable behavior). Maybe = you have a strong intuition or analog from another market. Not yet = you have neither. Most first-time founders score themselves Yes on everything. Most experienced founders score themselves Maybe on everything. The honest answer is usually Not yet on at least 2 dimensions; that's where validation work should focus.
Why is the per-dimension breakdown gated?
Because the score alone is a useful sanity check (free). The playbook is the per-dimension breakdown: which dimensions are strong, which are weak, and what to do about each. We give the playbook to people who sign up. If you want it without signing up, run validation on the weakest dimension first; the answer in this calc tells you which one that is.

A score is a diagnosis, not a plan.

ShipFit takes the same five dimensions and turns them into nine decisions with the evidence attached, ending in a spec you can hand to Cursor or Claude Code.

No credit card required.

Try an example: